Sumit Nagal vs Daniel Altmaier Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nagal vs Altmaier analysis and find out who is favored!
Sumit Nagal vs Daniel Altmaier Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Nagal 1 - 0 Altmaier
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nagal has won 55.15% of points on their second serve, while Altmaier has won 49.02%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nagal, in recent form, has won 53.83% of their opponent's second serve points, while Altmaier has won 46.06%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.13% and 29.19% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nagal has saved 63.68% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Altmaier has saved 57.3% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nagal has won 57.97% of matches played (W/L 40/ 29), with Altmaier winning 38.18% (W/L 21/ 34) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nagal has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 214/ 127), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Altmaier has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 126/ 73), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 35% (W/L 7/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Nagal has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 63.04% of matches (W/L 29/ 17), where as Altmaier has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 37.04% of matches (W/L 10/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nagal winning 1 times and Altmaier being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nagal winning 2 and Altmaier winning 0. The last match between Nagal and Altmaier was at the Coquimbo 2 Challenger, 18-10-2022, First, Clay with Sumit Nagal getting the victory 6-2 7-6(7).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:10:37.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nagal and Altmaier have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nagal winning 0 times and Altmaier 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Nagal winning 1, and Altmaier 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nagal has played against opponents with an average rank of 252.25 while Altmaier has played against players with an average rank of 185.95.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nagal has won 40% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Altmaier has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nagal has converted 46.38% of breakpoint opportunities, and Altmaier has converted 40.13% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
14
Total
0
Mast
5
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
9
Minor
95
Rank
80
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
83
Rank
47
High
25
Age
R
Plays
16
Total
0
Mast
7
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
9
Minor
Form
60% (317-207)
Career Total W/L
61% (370-238)
58% (18-13)
YTD W/L
37% (10-17)
$434,190
Career Prize Money
$1,210,200
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Sumit Nagal | Daniel Altmaier |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 8 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 2 |
Avg Match Time | 2:10:37 | 2:10:37 |
1st Serve % | 77% (50/65) | 62% (47/76) |
1st Serve Win% | 62% (31/50) | 60% (28/47) |
2nd Serve Win% | 53% (8/15) | 45% (13/29) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 36% (4/11) | 67% (2/3) |
Return Points W% | 46% (35/76) | 40% (26/65) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 7-6(7) |
Sumit Nagal
Player
Daniel Altmaier
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
47 of
76)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
74
Total Points Won
67
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Sumit Nagal | Daniel Altmaier |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 58% (18/13) | 37% (10/17) |
Sets Win/Loss | 59% (44/31) | 39% (26/40) |
Games Win/Loss | 53% (380/332) | 48% (315/346) |
Hard Win/Loss | 64% (14/8) | 45% (5/6) |
Clay Win/Loss | 44% (4/5) | 31% (5/11) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.16 | 0.37 |
Aces Total | 55 | 121 |
DFs per game | 0.12 | 0.19 |
DFs Total | 43 | 61 |
Avg Match Time | 1:55:48 | 2:2:11 |
Avg Opp Rank | 211.48 | 199.89 |
1st Serve % | 70% (1610/2290) | 63% (1337/2106) |
1st Serve W% | 67% (1071/1610) | 68% (908/1337) |
2nd Serve W% | 55% (375/680) | 49% (377/769) |
BPs Won% Total | 46% (96/207) | 40% (63/157) |
Return Pts W% | 39% (891/2262) | 36% (737/2063) |
Slam W/L | 67% (4/2) | 33% (1/2) |
Masters W/L | 50% (4/4) | 40% (4/6) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 25% (1/3) | 38% (5/8) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 69% (9/4) | 0% (0/1) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 61% (17/28) | 38% (9/24) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 33% (1/3) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 47% (7/15) |
Deciding Set W% | 33% (3/9) | 50% (3/6) |
1st set W, W | 76% (21/16) | 82% (11/9) |
1st set W, L | 24% (21/5) | 18% (11/2) |
1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 6% (16/1) |
Sumit Nagal Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Karen Khachanov
Player
Sumit Nagal
64%
(
63 of
99)
1st Serve %
73%
(
64 of
88)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
33%
(
33 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
88)
107
Total Points Won
80
|
6-2 6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sebastian Baez
Player
Sumit Nagal
77%
(
55 of
71)
1st Serve %
73%
(
43 of
59)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
19 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Harold Mayot
Player
Sumit Nagal
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Holger Rune
Player
Sumit Nagal
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
88)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sumit Nagal
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
97)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
6
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
72%
(
26 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
103
Total Points Won
94
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Sumit Nagal
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
70%
(
59 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
84)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
43%
(
36 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
85
Total Points Won
83
|
7-5 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Sumit Nagal
Player
Flavio Cobolli
73%
(
52 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
24 of
38)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Lorenzo Sonego
Player
Sumit Nagal
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
73%
(
62 of
85)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
22 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
85)
80
Total Points Won
79
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sumit Nagal
Player
Corentin Moutet
74%
(
66 of
89)
1st Serve %
80%
(
53 of
66)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
29 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
21 of
66)
81
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Sumit Nagal
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve %
70%
(
70 of
100)
16
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
85%
(
51 of
60)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
32%
(
11 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
32 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
100)
101
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H |
view more
Daniel Altmaier Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Player
Daniel Altmaier
64%
(
74 of
116)
1st Serve %
63%
(
67 of
106)
7
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
2
73%
(
54 of
74)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
51 of
67)
69%
(
29 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
33 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
36 of
106)
119
Total Points Won
103
|
6-3 6-2 6-7(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Altmaier
Player
Laslo Djere
67%
(
122 of
183)
1st Serve %
63%
(
137 of
217)
11
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
6
73%
(
89 of
122)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
95 of
137)
52%
(
32 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
34%
(
62 of
183)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
84 of
217)
205
Total Points Won
195
|
7-5 6-4 6-7(6) 5-7 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Roberto Carballes Baena
Player
Daniel Altmaier
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
44%
(
34 of
78)
0
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
24 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Luca Nardi
Player
Daniel Altmaier
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
79%
(
42 of
53)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Daniel Altmaier
48%
(
35 of
73)
1st Serve %
55%
(
48 of
87)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
47%
(
34 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
40 of
87)
79
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R3 |
Hubert Hurkacz
Player
Daniel Altmaier
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Daniel Altmaier
Player
Arthur Fils
84%
(
42 of
50)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
7
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Altmaier
Player
Martin Landaluce
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Arthur Fils
Player
Daniel Altmaier
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Altmaier
Player
Alexei Popyrin
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
52%
(
36 of
69)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
19 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H |
view more